Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and U.S. Access Board re Multiple Chemical Sensitivities (MCS)  and Electromagnetic Sensitivity (EMS)

From: JCMPelican
Sent: 5/14/2009 11:49:04 P.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: Fwd: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and U.S. Access Board....review re...

Subject:   Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and U.S. Access Board re Multiple Chemical Sensitivities (MCS)  and Electromagnetic Sensitivity (EMS)

From: JCMPelican
Sent: 5/14/2009 11:38:25 P.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and U.S. Access Board....review re EMS..

UNITED STATES ACCESS BOARD 

A Federal Agency Committed to Accessible Design

http://www.access-board.gov/

	REPORT ON INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY RELEASED
	There are those who have developed an acute sensitivity to various types of chemicals, a condition known as Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS). The report includes recommendations on improving indoor environmental quality that address building products, materials, ventilation, and maintenance. A panel organized to serve as a steering committee for the project included representation from MCS and EMS organizations, experts on indoor environmental quality, and representatives from the ...    (full report below)   Report on Indoor Environmental Quality Released July 22, 2005  A growing number of people suffer a range of debilitating physical reactions from exposures to everyday materials and chemicals found in building products, floor coverings, cleaning products, and fragrances, among others. There are those who have developed an acute sensitivity to various types of chemicals, a condition known as Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS). The range and severity of reactions are as varied as the potential triggering agents. In addition, there are others who report reactions from exposures to electrical devices and frequencies, a condition referred to as Electro-Magnetic Sensitivity (EMS). In response to these concerns, the Board sponsored a study on ways to improve indoor environmental quality for people with MCS and EMS as well as for the population generally. Conducted for the Board by the National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS), this project brought together various stakeholders to explore issues and to develop an action plan. A copy of the resulting report is now available on the NIBS website at http://ieq.nibs.org. While the project was focused on commercial and public buildings, many of the issues addressed and recommendations offered are applicable in residential settings. The report includes recommendations on improving indoor environmental quality that address building products, materials, ventilation, and maintenance. A panel organized to serve as a steering committee for the project included representation from MCS and EMS organizations, experts on indoor environmental quality, and representatives from the building industry. Panel members explored various strategies for collecting and disseminating information, selecting focus areas, increasing awareness of the issues involved, broadening participation in the project, developing recommendations for best practices, and identifying potentialpartners for further study and outreach. Indoor Environmental Quality Project Steering Committee MCS & EMS Representatives • Ann McCampbell, M.D., Multiple Chemical Sensitivities Task Force of New Mexico • Mary Lamielle, National Center for Environmental Health Strategies • Susan Molloy, National Coalition of the Chemically Impaired • Toni Temple, Ohio Network for the Chemically Injured Indoor Environmental Quality Experts • Nicholas A. Ashford, Ph.D., J.D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology • Mark C. Jackson, Lennox Industries, Inc. • Claudia S. Miller, M.D., M.S., University of Texas Health Sciences Center • Bruce M. Small, P.E., Georgetown, Ontario • James Wasley, University of Wisconsin Building Industry Representatives • Ron Burton, Building Owners and Managers Association • William Dean, Associated General Contractors of America • Harry Gordon, FAIA, American Institute of Architects • Brent Kynoch, Kynoch Environmental Management, Inc. • Roger Morse, AIA, Morse Zehnter Associates
	http://www.access-board.gov/news/ieq.htm         Board Conducts Forum on its Agenda and Services July 29, 2005   As part of program of seminars to recognize the ADA's 15th anniversary, the Board held a public forum on its agenda and services. The event allowed the public to make recommendations to the Board on topics or issues that should be addressed in its work writing guidelines and standards or sponsoring research. The Board also welcomed suggestions for new guidance and training materials and how this information and related services can be delivered most effectively to its various audiences, particularly through its website. "As the Board looks toward the next decade," Board Member James R. Harding, II Ed.D., noted in welcoming remarks, "we want to know if there are new accessibility challenges you think we need to address." The feedback received at this forum, which attracted a wide auidence, touched a variety topics, including information technology, indoor environmental quality, communication access, mobility access, and guidance materials, among others.   Board members listen to comments received from the public at the forum. (From left around table: John O. Woods, Jr., Daniel O. Rios, James J. Elekes, Philip G. Pearce, Gwendolyn Trujillo, John H. Hager, James R. Harding, Douglas Anderson, Denis Pratt, Gary L. Talbot, Pamela Dorwarth, and Tricia Mason) Accessible information technology was a popular subject. It was recommended that the Board take an active role in coordinating its work on access to electronic and information technology with international organizations, such as the European Union, in order to advance global harmonization and standardization. The goal of this effort, it was suggested, should be to make the standards the Board developed under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act a “global market catalyst” for international coordination. In addition, it was recommended that the Board address new or convergent types of technologies through its 508 standards and to harmonize them with guidelines for websites developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). Participants urged the Board to undertake actions to help improve the quality of indoor environments, particularly for those who have multiple chemical sensitivities (MCS) or electromagnetic sensitivities (EMS). Attention was called to a newly released report from a study the Board sponsored on strategies for improving indoor environmental quality. This project was conducted by the National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS). David Harris, President of NIBS, offered suggestions for implementing recommendations from the study. Other comments called upon the Board to develop standards in this area. A number of comments addressed communication access for people who are deaf or hard of hearing. Concerns were raised about the effectiveness of visual fire alarms in sleeping rooms, accessible carbon monoxide detectors, and the need to address other types of alarms, such as tornado warnings, that may convey warnings or instructions that do not involve evacuation. Other issues noted included access to public address system information, including life safety instructions, and two-way communication systems, such as those at drive-though windows. In addition, recommendations were received on ways to improve access for people with vision impairments. These suggestions addressed criteria for tactile informational signs, lighting and sign illumination, barriers or tactile markings to distinguish pedestrian ways through parking lots from vehicle routes, among others. Support was expressed for addressing detectable warnings and audible pedestrian signals in the Board’s rulemaking on public rights-of-ways. The Board also received feedback on other topics and specific suggestions for guidance materials, research projects, training, outreach, and web-based services. (See detailed list below). In additon to the Board's forum, there were five other sessions addressing different aspects of the ADA. The full program, “The ADA: 15 Years of Making a Difference,” was organized by the National Council on Disability (NCD) in cooperation with various Federal agencies. Videos of the Board's session and other programs and events are available at www.at508.com/events. Further information is also available on NCD's website at www.ncd.gov.   Opening Remarks by Board Member James R. (“J.R.”) Harding, II Ed.D. It is my distinct honor to welcome you to this workshop on this, the 15th anniversary of the ADA. This workshop is aptly titled “15 Years of Making a Difference in Accessibility.” Indeed, the Access Board is very proud of our accomplishments over the last fifteen years. After the ADA was signed into law, members and staff of the Access Board joined together to craft the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines -- or ADAAG as it’s come to be known. Within one year the Access Board, working with other federal agencies, had issued ADAAG. Since that time, the Access Board has worked to improve our accessibility guidelines in such areas as recreation, public rights-of-way, passenger vessels, and play areas. And last summer the Access Board published a new version of ADAAG. These guidelines update access requirements for a wide range of facilities in the public and private sectors covered by the law. But this session is not about the Board’s past accomplishments. In this session, the Access Board wants to hear from you. As the Board looks toward the next decade, we want to know if there are new accessibility challenges you think we need to address. For example, what new guidelines or standards may be needed? What existing ones need to be changed? Are there new areas of research which the Board should pursue? What new training and technical assistance materials would be helpful? Are there information and communication issues which the Board should address? These are the types of issues we’d like to hear from you today. This is an open forum and we encourage anyone who wants to give their views to do so. James R. (“J.R.”) Harding, II Ed.D. of Tallahassee, Florida, is employed by the Department of Education, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation as a Partnership Specialist for the Office of the Director. Dr. Harding is active in a variety of organizations and causes, including the Governor's ADA Working Group, the Florida Building Commission Waiver Council, the Commission for Transportation Disadvantaged, the Citizens' Advisory Council of Leon County, and he is also an active member of the Chamber of Commerce. He received a doctorate in higher education from Florida State University (FSU) in 1999. President Bush appointed Dr. Harding to the Board in 2002. Recommendations Received at Forum Section 508 and Information Technology Build upon the infrastructure of Section 508 by convening an expanded Federal Advisory Committee on Section 508 to: Focus on international harmonization, particularly with the EU Refresh Section 508 by recognizing that industry functions within a global marketplace and must develop technologies according to economy of scale to compete Consider convergent technologies in the development of standards Section 508 must be enforced so that businesses that develop accessible products get a return for their investment Harmonize Section 508 standards with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) Indoor Environmental Quality Implement recommendations in the Report on Indoor Environmental Quality to improve building accessibility for individuals with multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) and electro-magnetic sensitivity (EMS) Develop standards to eliminate barriers caused by products or conditions involved in cleaning, maintaining, using, and operating buildings Write standards to require designated cleaner air rooms in buildings and facilities Address issues related to the use of building materials and electrical appliances that present barriers to individuals with MCS or EMS Be aware of Federal legislation, such as the Energy bill, that may present an opportunity to advocate for improved access for individuals with MCS or EMS Communications Issues Establish a committee of experts to review issues related to alerting devices for people who are deaf or hard of hearing to establish standards for alarms to signal the presence of carbon monoxide in room atmosphere and re-examine the efficacy of current standards for alarms in sleeping rooms The Board should maintain its policy that visual alarms must be hard-wired Ensure that all information that is conveyed through public address systems is accessible to people who are deaf or hard of hearing, particularly information related to life safety Ensure that two-way communication systems are accessible to people who are deaf or hard of hearing, e.g. drive-up windows at quick service restaurants and door access systems Develop guidelines for tactile informational signs Develop guidelines for general lighting and for signage illumination Move forward with the release of the guidelines for public rights-of-way, particularly the requirements for detectable warnings and accessible pedestrian signals Develop a requirement to physically separate the required accessible route connecting parking and bus routes to entrances from vehicular traffic so that people who are blind or have low vision do not have to cross vehicular lanes Mobility Issues Provide more diversity in the guidelines; for example, develop standards for two types of accessible parking spaces, one type for wheelchair or other mobility device users and one type for people who do not use mobility devices but cannot travel long distances Develop standards for companion restrooms Require that an accessible route be maintained during construction or alteration of buildings Technical Assistance, Training, and Research Develop fact sheets on assistive technology, see the Federal Communications Commission website for guidance Provide more guidance on the selection and installation of assistive listening systems Provide guidance on captioning Provide guidance on emergency evacuation of large public facilities, particularly places of assembly Provide guidance on noise mitigation in places of assembly for adaptive equipment Conduct research on emergency evacuation equipment, such as evacuation chairs Explore how the use of quiet vehicles, particularly the hybrid-type vehicles, could affect the ability of people who are blind or visually impaired to safely negotiate vehicular crossings Research the safety of accessible amusement rides for children with disabilities Utilize accessible on-line collaborative learning technologies to provide technical assistance and training Conduct outreach to inform Federal employees of the requirements of Section 508 Inform the public about the availability of web authoring tools that developers can use to design accessible websites Other Issues Support the adoption of the new ADA and ABA Accessibility Guidelines Use, and encourage others to use, language that focuses on people, not their disabilities. http://www.access-board.gov/news/ada-forum.htm

[ File notes:    Review Section 508 of Federal Advisory Committee   (ADA or?)    Check website for National Council on Disabiities for info re ES/EMS, etc.       Review  Access Board published a new version of ADAAG...probably 2004 and also determine whether new ADA and ABA Accessibility Guidelines were actually adopted.......jcm ....5-14-09....]